Verification: Verified Account
Member for: 9 years (since Jun 7, 2017)
Type: Editor
Extra privileges: Voting posts down
Recategorizing any question
Editing any question
Editing any answer
Editing any comment
Closing any question
Selecting answer for any question
Viewing IPs of anonymous posts
Approving or rejecting posts
Hiding or showing any post
Viewing the newest users page
Full name: Sudeshna Chaudhuri
GATE Year: 2018,2019
GATE Rank: 1893,308
About: IITG M.Tech CSE
Resume: https://gateoverflow.in/?qa=blob&qa_blobid=16501258833363771901
GitHub Profile Link:
DBLP Link:
Following standard books?: Yes for the important topics
Home State: West Bengal
Donate Me Link:
Messages from only those in my circle:

Activity by MiNiPanda

Score: 100 points (ranked #147)
No. of Edits: 0
Posts: 0
Questions: 0
Answers: 0
Comments: 0
Voted on: 0 questions, 0 answers
Gave out: 0 up votes, 0 down votes
Received: 0 up votes, 0 down votes
Reactions received: 0
Network Sites:

Wall for MiNiPanda

Please log in or register to post on this wall.
Gurdeep Saini Feb 1, 2019
best of luck
MiNiPanda Nov 27, 2018
For which explanation?
And you mean if receiver receives a frame with sequence no. K successfully then will it send an acknowledgement with sequence no. (K+1) or not?
Actually it's implementation dependent. In some places that is the case. The receiver indicates that it has successfully received all the frames upto seq no. K and is wanting frame no. (K+1) now.
And in some places ack might have sequence no. K indicating that receiver has successfully received till frame K.
nilubabu2 Nov 26, 2018
Hi thanks for you explanation. I have some doubt on following,
Can you please explain......for Go-Back N protocol or other sliding window protocol also (i.e Stop-Wait, ARQ) at a particular time 't', the frame sequence number in sender if 'K', then acknowledgement sequence number from receiver to sender should be k+1. Is this correct if not please explain.